• Announcements

    • Editor

      Civil Discourse is Back!

      Civil Discourse, established in 2000, is up and running again after a hiatus. Ours is a boutique web site with a tight group of enthusiasts dedicated to substantive, amicable discussion. We are always happy to welcome like-minded contributors to the forum, regardless of their political, religious or philosophical leanings. Please join our effort to bring civility to online conversation. Click here to learn what CD is all about, here to see our master forum page and here for tips on starting or joining discussions. Register as yourself or under a pseudonym, and you'll soon be eligible to start new conversations, plunge into current debates, and jump-start dormant topics on which you have fresh ideas. If you're not receiving our weekly updates, click your name at the top of any page and be sure you've entered your e-mail address correctly. Send questions and suggestions to EditorCivilDiscourse@yahoo.com. Tell your friends about us, and let's all get Civilized.
Joe McQuade

Gop Loves/hates Hillary: O Hypocrisy, Where Is Thy Sting?

5 posts in this topic

Today in Salon: http://www.salon.com...urce=newsletter

The Right's Coming Break-Up With Hillary

Clinton's been one of the "good" Democrats in their post-2008 messaging. But that's probably going to change soon

By Steve Kornacki

Hillary Clinton has been on the national stage for two decades now, and when it comes to her treatment by Republicans, that time can be divided into two distinct periods.

The first ran for 16 years, from early 1992, when her husband survived a wave of scandals and emerged as the Democratic nominee for president, and early 2008, when Hillary fell hopelessly behind Barack Obama in their delegate race. For all of that time, Hillary and Bill were the faces of their party and, consequently, faced a relentless, daily, over-the-top assault from the GOP. The precise nature of the attacks differed, but broadly speaking, the Clintons were treated by the right exactly how Barack Obama has been for the past four years.

Which is no coincidence, because the turning point in the right’s relationship with Bill and Hillary came at the precise moment when it became clear there’d be no Clinton restoration in ’08. Suddenly, there was no day-to-day incentive for conservatives to portray them as The Worst Thing Ever To Happen To American Politics. But there was real incentive for the right to begin giving Obama the Clinton treatment, which they’ve been doing ever since. In the revised right-wing narrative, Bill and Hillary became symbols of a bygone era of Democratic pragmatism and cooperation – “good” Democrats whose legacy Obama was routinely tarnishing with his radical partisan warfare.

The result was predictable. With Hillary no longer subjected to attacks – and with the right heaping praise on her instead – her poll numbers soared to record heights. Her favorable score has sat close to 70 percent for years now.

She and her husband are still among the most prominent public figures in the world, but for the first time since their ’92 breakthrough, they haven’t been confronted with an opposition party intent on seizing every opportunity to tear them down. Bill’s poll numbers are astronomical too.

In the first few years of Obama’s presidency, there was no real consequence to this for the right. But in the past year, the price has become clearer. First, there was the 2012 campaign, in which Bill – capitalizing on the broad popularity and enhanced stature that Republicans helped him attain –

on Obama’s behalf. And now that the political world is beginning to think about 2016, it’s become apparent that Hillary will be a front-runner like we’ve rarely seen if she joins the race.

So Republicans have a problem. As long as the threat of another Clinton campaign looms, they can’t continue with their hands-off approach. They must find a way to make her a villain all over again, to revert to their 1992-2008 treatment of her – and fast.

This may end up being the real long-term political significance of the scathing Benghazi report that was released yesterday. In the months since the attack, Republicans have largely given the secretary of state a pass, focusing their ire on Susan Rice, who was seen as Clinton’s likely successor in the Cabinet. But now Rice is out of the way, announcing last week that she won’t pursue the State post. So the new report offers the right a perfect pivot point – away from the Rice attacks of the past few months, and the Clinton idolatry of the past few years. Hillary won’t testify before Congress this week because of the concussion she recently suffered, but she’s under pressure to do so in January. Assuming she does then, it will offer an interesting test: Will Republicans start piling on like it’s 1994 again?

The point here isn’t that fallout from the Benghazi report will have much lasting harm on Clinton’s ’16 prospects. For all we know, the issue will barely come up if she ends up running. But this could be another spring ’08 moment, when we witness a dramatic shift in the right’s Clinton narrative almost overnight. If that happens, then Benghazi is just the start, and soon conservatives will be shredding Hillary (and maybe Bill too) on a whole range of topics.

With the GOP again dedicating itself to harming her politically, Clinton’s gaudy poll numbers would probably drop. That alone wouldn’t change her status as the clear favorite for her party’s ’16 nod (if she wants it). But it would offer her a vivid reminder of what it was like to live for 16 years as the preeminent target of the Republican messaging machine. And it might make her ask: Do I really want to live that way again for four – or eight – more years?

Steve Kornacki writes about politics for Salon. Reach him by email at SKornacki@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @SteveKornacki

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have wondered this very thing at moments in the past week when I heard that some of the right-wing sappers have start floating "She's not really sick, she just doesn't want to testify!" out into the chatmosphere to see if it flies or falls. My nearly infallible instinct for impending misery is telling me that the Republican machine is definitely gearing up to make their first big moves regarding the 2016 election, heaven help us all, and it's all about Mme Clinton. The marching season is never over anymore; we never have any time at all in which to recover from the latest excesses and follies but it all just cranks over again. Why, this is Hell nor are we out of it.

Edited by Quiet Rain

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

....Keep me sane here...You do both realize that both parties act exactly in the same manner, right?

Don't you have to give some of the credit to Hillary actually being an exceptional Secretary of State for at least some of the rise in her popularity. I'm not saying that the sudden reversal of characterization of the Clinton years did not produce an "ah ha" moment for me. Just saying there were aspects of people actually just evaluating her work over the last four years asking themselves if they were wrong about Hillary.

Susan Rice got a raw deal, both by the administration and some members of the GOP. She was sent out with a message and delivered it. Unfortunately for her the message was fabricated. Maybe she knew that maybe she didn't but essentially she was doing her job. I don't know too much about her but have heard a bit about her style and think maybe we lost out.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a bit of anecdotal evidence in Hillary's favor. A couple of my right wing friends (Obama haters, Rush listeners, Glen Beck readers) say they can't wait to vote for her, because she'll bring Clintonian prosperity back to the land.

Needless to say, their rationale is incoherent. But I'm not eager to talk them out of it...

Though a life-long Democrat, I once was a Hillary hater myself. I thought she and her husband put the country through two years of Monica-related agony for no reason other than to save their hides. As David Geffen said, the problem is not that she and Bill lie; it's that they do it reflexively, and with such ease. And her feckless, indecisive campaign in 2008 did not put to rest my doubts about her managerial ability.

But the Clintons' rehabilitation over the past four years has been a remarkable thing. In the end, could it be that they have found their proper places -- as larger-than-life players, but ones without their hands on the wheel?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Susan Rice got a raw deal, both by the administration and some members of the GOP...I don't know too much about her but have heard a bit about her style and think maybe we lost out.

I, too, find her an impressive figure. Point guard and Phi Beta Kappa at Stanford, Ph.D from Oxford on a Rhodes scholarship. Tough and accomplished presence in the foreign policy intelligentsia.

One red flag, however. During Rice's brief audition on Capitol Hill, Susan Collins (the moderate Maine GOP senator), began her meeting with Rice on the fence. By the end of it, she was a full-throated opponent. A chilling turn of events for a would-be diplomatic leader.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now