• Announcements

    • Editor

      Civil Discourse is Back!

      Civil Discourse, established in 2000, is up and running again after a hiatus. Ours is a boutique web site with a tight group of enthusiasts dedicated to substantive, amicable discussion. We are always happy to welcome like-minded contributors to the forum, regardless of their political, religious or philosophical leanings. Please join our effort to bring civility to online conversation. Click here to learn what CD is all about, here to see our master forum page and here for tips on starting or joining discussions. Register as yourself or under a pseudonym, and you'll soon be eligible to start new conversations, plunge into current debates, and jump-start dormant topics on which you have fresh ideas. If you're not receiving our weekly updates, click your name at the top of any page and be sure you've entered your e-mail address correctly. Send questions and suggestions to EditorCivilDiscourse@yahoo.com. Tell your friends about us, and let's all get Civilized.
Quiet Rain

Resignation of the Pope

3 posts in this topic

I am not Catholic and I have only an ordinarily well-read person's familiarity with the trials and problems of the modern Catholic church. To me, the Catholic church has always seemed quite corporate in its structure. Very hierarchical, rule-driven, political, with factions and in-fighting and intrigue, its own unique culture (complete with many levels of glass ceilings) and lots and lots of money.

To extend the church as a corporation metaphor, everyone is aware that the Catholic "brand" has taken some serious beatings in the last two decades. Child molestation is the most horrific and universally discussed problem but the demographic shifts the church has suffered in the countries that were formerly bastions of the faith is also impacting the "company" bottom line -- schools and churches are closing, parishes are losing priests that are not being replaced; as they say in business, nobody ever downsized to greatness. Whether this is largely due to the criminal revelations or due in part to the reactionary expunging of Vatican II doctrines, who knows. Hard to pick out the individual rocks during a slide.

I find myself wondering if the Pope is stepping aside to allow the "board" to establish new management, hopefully to reverse the breathtaking decline now taking place. He must realize that he has become personally identified with much that is wrong with the church's current tack. If this is the case, perhaps whoever is elevated next will startle the world by taking ownership of the horrific criminal acts committed under the cloak of church protection and cleaning house. There need to be trials and prison terms for, oh, quite a few people. And recognition and humble apology and reparations at the least on the part of the See for the tardiness and paucity of response, followed by serious changes in the culture to prevent future crimes.

Perhaps that would allow the church to save its influence in Europe, North America and Australia, for which circumstance it appears to be very eager. Perhaps. But, as brand names go, the Vatican has become nearly as despised as Bank of America and Exxon Mobile in many places. Cleaning up this mess, if that indeed is their intent, will not be easy. I pity their next CEO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem is, all of the voting cardinals are conservatives appointed by this guy and his equally reactionary predecessor. Neither of them showed much interest in modernization, ordaining women or chasing down priestly pederasts. So don't look for another reformer like John XXIII.

Wikipedia reports that the 209-member College of Cardinals has 118 voting members under age 80. Sixty-seven were appointed by Benedict XVI, and the remaining 51 were chosen by John Paul II.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oddly, I don't think the conservatives that Benedict and John Paul packed into the college will be a problem for the church cleaning house. Benedict is a conservative's conservative and if he thinks things are bad enough and that he has failed enough to warrant going into seclusion, it's likely he's not alone in thinking so. It may well be that the college is in complete agreement that something draconian and fast is called for to repair the damage the church is suffering. I doubt that any doctrinal fresh air is about to be loosed but perhaps structural and functional controls might be reformed to make criminal activity easier to prevent and expunge. It will be interesting to see a year from now what will or won't have changed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now